INTUC dispute drags on despite Sonia Gandhi’s intervention

0

In the UP, the INTUC had a formidable presence, which eroded due to factionalism.

New Delhi: Although Congress President Sonia Gandhi personally intervened and set a deadline, Congress leaders were tasked with amicably settling the more than 15-year-old intra-party dispute over the ‘real’ National Congress. Indian Trade Unions (INTUC). have produced no results and the dispute continues to escalate. In an effort to revive INTUC and the Congress among the working class, Gandhi in August last year summoned the two warring leaders – Chandrashekhar Dubey, based in Jharkhand, and G Sanjeev Reddy, based in Andhra Pradesh, and the deputy general secretary of the party and deputy of the Rajya Sabha, Digvijaya. Singh and Rajya Sabha opposition leader Mallikarjuna Kharge to work out ways to resolve the dispute and unite the two factions. Both Reddy and Dubey claim to be the chairman of the ‘real’ INTUC, which has led to the two groups filing a series of lawsuits against each other in several courts across India. As a collateral damage of this more than 15 year old dispute, the INTUC has lost its support and recognition.
Gandhi, while asking the two factions to settle the differences amicably, had said that if they were unable to resolve it on their own, the party would make a decision on its own. A year-end deadline (December 2021) was set by Gandhi for the issues to be resolved. Following this, the two factions submitted troves of documents with the two-member committee comprising Singh and Kharge basically to prove which of the two was the more “influential” INTUC. However, after this August meeting and the subsequent submission of documents, the problem subsided as central management took care of other issues.
The Sunday Guardian has contacted KC Venugopal for a response to the matter. Venugopal, in its response, said “the issue of settlement in this matter is ongoing.” Following the party’s poor performance in the elections in Uttar Pradesh, where the INTUC had a formidable presence, much of which is eroded due to factionalism, the two groups were invited by the party’s general secretary, KC Venugopal, April 6, to withdraw all complaints filed. against each other in different Indian courts before April 30. According to Delhi-based party officials, the dispute continued to persist as the Reddy faction was “not cooperating”. While the Dubey Group has already submitted a “Terms of Settlement” on their end and have regularly responded and submitted documents as desired by the two-member committee, the Reddy Group has not cooperated. Significantly, it was the Reddy Group that first turned the intra-party dispute into a legal dispute when it filed a lawsuit in the Delhi High Court in 2010 seeking to bar the Dubey Group from operating as chairman of the party. ‘INTUC. The said petition was however declared unsuccessful on March 24, 2014.
Although the Dubey Group has stated in writing that it is willing to withdraw the records it has filed, no such correspondence has been received from the Reddy Group. In February 2017, the Union Labor Ministry banned INTUC, founded three months before India’s independence, from participating in any tripartite or bipartisan meetings on national and international platforms, citing the intra-union battle between INTUC leaders.


Source link

Share.

Comments are closed.